Inform, Entertain, Inspire
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Homeland Security Proposal Could Impact ND International Students

Today is the last day the Department of Homeland Security is open to feedback on its new proposed rule that would impose new time limits on student visas.

 

Notre Dame filed a formal comment this weekend urging the Department of Homeland Security to withdraw the proposal.

 

The proposed policy would restrict international students to a stay of two to four years with the opportunity to apply for an extension. Students from countries with high overstay rates would be restricted even further. 

In the official comment, Notre Dame said the policy doesn’t align with typical program lengths and would decrease diversity in higher education. 

A Venezuelan Notre Dame student, Maria Luisa Paul, says the policy makes her feel dehumanized.

 

“We’re being defined in terms of statistics. I feel like our humanity is being stripped,” Paul said.

Lan Anh Dinh, a Notre Dame student from Vietnam, has mixed feelings about Notre Dame’s stance against the policy.

 

“I’m happy for this particular case that Notre Dame is taking this stance I’ve never expected consistency from them because they haven’t shown it.” Dinh explained.

 

(You can read Notre Dame's position on the issue below.)

 

In a letter to the acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), University of Notre Dame President Rev. John I. Jenkins, C.S.C., registered his concerns with proposed changes to the department’s policy that would make it harder for international students to enroll in U.S. universities.

If enacted, the policy would limit international students and exchange visitors to a fixed period of two to four years, with the opportunity to apply for an extension. Student visas under the current policy are good for “duration of status,” meaning students can stay in the United States indefinitely if they remain enrolled in school and abide by rules related to their immigration status.

In his letter to Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, Father Jenkins wrote that the change “would be unworkable for most foreign students, including those pursuing post-baccalaureate degrees,” since doctoral programs usually take more than four years and even some undergraduate students need five or six years to graduate.

Rather than force international students to cope with more restrictive approval procedures, Father Jenkins suggested that DHS “judge adherence to the existing policy by examining the records of compliance by students at the American universities they attend or at which they hope to enroll,” adding that such an approach is a “fairer and surer way for your department to protect the national security interests of the United States.”

Father Jenkins also expressed concern about the DHS identification of countries that have “purportedly high percentages of visa overstays,” noting that these are “impoverished countries from which few international students manage to enroll in the United States.” Of particular interest to Father Jenkins was the inclusion of Haiti and the Philippines, where Notre Dame has “special relationships among the poor. While DHS reports that students from each country are more likely overstay their visas, Notre Dame has not found that to be the case.” Of the 1,546 international students enrolled at Notre Dame for the 2019-20 academic year, only one did not have a proper departure record, and he was neither Haitian nor Filipino.

In closing, Father Jenkins wrote that he was “encouraged by DHS recognition that American higher education is the envy of the world” as well as by the “increasing number of foreign students who are seeking degrees from and enrolling in American universities. I recognize that your department is responsible for screening these increasing numbers of foreign students. However, DHS funding should be increased to meet the demand rather than restrict wholesale admission of desirable foreign students to our institutions of higher learning.”

Notre Dame will submit in coming days a formal, comprehensive comment in opposition to the proposed rule change.

Father Jenkins’ letter can be read in full here.

Related Content