PFAS

Because of limited funding approved by Indiana lawmakers, there are only 1,000 spots available in the testing program for more than 5,000 Hoosier firefighters

Indiana manufacturers pushed to change the state’s definition of toxic PFAS to ensure they can continue using some of those chemicals. That effort failed at the Statehouse. But we’ll likely see more legislation like this as manufacturers try to hold on to chemicals the federal government wants to limit.

Indiana manufacturers want to exempt certain PFAS chemicals from the definition of PFAS — so they can continue using them to make things like medical devices, drugs and cars. But the bill’s opponents say it would also allow them to make other, non-essential products that make people sick.

A bill that would change the definition of toxic PFAS to exclude chemicals Indiana manufacturers want to continue using passed the House on Tuesday.

Indiana manufacturers want to continue to be able to use certain types of toxic PFAS. A state House bill, HB 1399, aims to change the definition of PFAS under Indiana law to exclude the specific chemicals they want to use.

State legislators passed two laws aimed at protecting firefighters from toxic PFAS this year. One requires fire stations to buy PFAS-free gear and another sets up a pilot program to test firefighters’ blood for the chemicals. The Indiana Chamber of Commerce wants to make sure those laws don't prevent Indiana manufacturers from using PFAS.

That includes utilities serving the cities of Logansport, Columbus, Elkhart, and Sellersburg as well as Watson Rural Water Company.

The Environmental Working Group says its research shows a vast shortfall in DOD spending on PFAS cleanup on military and former military bases.

People affected by PFAS contamination are pushing Michigan lawmakers for more action. But it could be weeks until legislation is introduced in the state House.