Indiana Supreme Court finalists discuss judicial philosophy, diversity
Hoosiers will learn within the next couple of months who their new state Supreme Court justice will be.
The Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission conducted public interviews with 10 candidates this week before choosing three nominees.
Many of the candidates were asked about judicial philosophy, particularly when it comes to how much consideration judges should give the legislative branch. Finalist Derek Molter, an Indiana Court of Appeals judge, explained his view.
“Even if it seems poor policy choice or there be a better way to do things, the court must always defer to the legislature,” Molter said.
Some candidates were asked about their personality, their demeanor. Grant County Judge Dana Kenworthy, another finalist, acknowledged that she’s an introvert, very quiet – something she said she’s been asked a lot about through the process.
“My words are obviously not loud, but my actions are and my legacy is," Kenworthy said. "And I am not done yet.”
Join the conversation and sign up for the Indiana Two-Way. Text "Indiana" to 73224. Your comments and questions in response to our weekly text help us find the answers you need on statewide issues.
The potential nominees were also asked about diversity – or lack thereof – in the legal profession and how the Supreme Court can improve it. Supreme Court Chief Administrative Officer Justin Forkner, the third finalist, said he’s already worked towards that in hiring practices.
“When we accept the premise of things like unconscious bias in decision-making, you have to be consciously unbiased to fix that,” Forkner said.
The governor will pick the next justice from those three finalists. They will replace retiring Justice Steven David, who announced his retirement last November.