-
The Marshall County Commissioners have voted to cover up the county’s Flock cameras but leave them in place. Still, questions remain about who actually has authority over them.
-
The Michigan City Police Department still wants to expand its use of Flock Safety equipment, despite an investigation into an officer’s alleged misuse of the technology.
-
Four Marshall County Council members voted to remove the county's six Flock cameras to protect motorists' privacy, while three members said they're needed for safety.
-
Funding for Flock cameras will not be included in Kosciusko County’s 2027 budget. The county council voted Thursday to withhold funding for any automated license plate readers or similar equipment.
-
Last month, the county commissioners voted to move from two-year to one-year contracts, but it turns out that the county switched to a five-year contract back in 2023.
-
Constantine Police Chief Dan Thayer is assuring his village that a new Michigan Department of Transportation device on Old U.S. 131/Washington Street is not a Flock camera.
-
The Starke County Sheriff’s Office will not renew its contract for Flock cameras. In a Facebook post, the department said Sheriff Jack Rosa made the decision “in the best interest of the community.”
-
The Michigan City Police Department says a routine audit of Flock system activity turned up searches that violated its policies.
-
The Marshall County Commissioners Monday voted 3-0 to change to annual contracts with Flock Safety for license plate readers, to allow more scrutiny of the system as public privacy concerns grow.
-
St. Joseph County’s Republican candidates for sheriff and prosecutor say Flock cameras are a great tool, but they’re open to more guardrails.